Scientific Publications Database

Article Title: Vulnerable carotid plaque imaging and histopathology without a dedicated MRI receiver coil
Authors: Fitzpatrick, Laura A.; Berkovitz, Nadav; dos Santos, Marlise P.; Majeed, Nevin; Glikstein, Rafael; Chakraborty, Santanu; Veinot, John P.; Stotts, Grant; Berthiaume, Alain; Chatelain, Robert
Journal: NEURORADIOLOGY JOURNAL Volume 30 Issue 2
Date of Publication:2017
Abstract:
Stroke is associated with vulnerable carotid artery plaques showing specific histopathologic features, namely a lipid-rich necrotic core, intraplaque hemorrhage, ulceration, and thin fibrous cap. While ultrasound and computed tomography (CT) can identify carotid plaques and determine the extent of stenosis, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides further information regarding plaque composition and morphology.In this feasibility study, three patients with symptomatic, moderately stenosed plaques were imaged with CT angiography (CTA) and MRI (3T and 1.5T) without a dedicated receiver coil. The patients subsequently underwent carotid endarterectomy with en-bloc excision of the plaque. The CT and MR images were analyzed independently by three neuroradiologists to identify vulnerable plaque features. The images were correlated with the histopathology to confirm the findings.All three patients had one or more vulnerable plaque features on histopathology. MRI allowed for better characterization of these features when compared to CTA. The pre- and post-contrast T1-weighted (T1W) images were most helpful for identifying the lipid-rich necrotic core and thin fibrous cap, while the time of flight-magnetic resonance angiography (TOF-MRA) and contrast-enhanced (CE)-MRA were excellent for detecting plaque hemorrhage and ulceration, respectively. The 3T images showed superior spatial and contrast resolution compared to the 1.5T images for all sequences.By providing direct correlation between imaging and histopathology, this study demonstrates that 3T MRI without a dedicated surface coil is an excellent tool for assessing plaque vulnerability. In smaller hospitals or those with limited resources, it is reasonable to consider conventional MRI for patient risk stratification. Further studies are needed to determine how MRI and plaque vulnerability can be incorporated into routine clinical practice.